People define
non-violence in their own definite terms keeping the reality aside
and it does not mean sitting idle like a coward.
A king has ordered his
army commander to retaliate the attacks of neighboring king who
violated the boundaries of his kingdom with the intention of
occupying some of the villages.
The commander of the king
was peace-loving one who does not want any kind blood-shed or the
war. But this was an order of his king for which he is bound to
oblige.
To clear this confusion
the commander approached Buddha for help. Speaking to Buddha,
commander asked “In war, we will be compelled to kill many
thousands of soldiers, don't you think it is non-violent act?”
Buddha immediately
replied to commander, “Yes, it is definitely a non-violent act,
but will the enemy retreat from our lands without fighting?”
Commander said “no,
they won't go without fighting”
Then Buddha said “it
means they will kill all the innocent people and plunder the
villages”. Commander agreed by nodding his head.
Then Buddha explained
“Don’t' you think that is non-violence, if you sit idle the
citizens of the kingdom will be killed, and for all innocent deaths
you will be accountable”, Commander hanged his head in shame.
Buddha inquired the
commander “Is your army capable in stopping the enemy?”
Commander said “Yes,
our troops can manage that with a single order, they will kick the
enemy out of our boundaries.”
So Buddha said “order
your soldiers to stop the enemy invasion and send their soldiers back
to their places.”
By this commander
realized the difference between non-violence and violence and acted
wisely since then.
No comments:
Post a Comment